Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:5 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:5;
Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2023 09:51:36 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
        Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/core: Introduce cpuctx->cgrp_ctx_list
Message-ID: <20231011075136.GM14330@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20231004040844.797044-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
 <20231004160224.GB6307@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <CAM9d7cizC0J85ByuF5fBmc_Bqi=wpNJpiVsw+3F1Avusn2aQog@mail.gmail.com>
 <20231009210425.GC6307@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <CAM9d7cigs9mWuYiE=MYNg-xVhXzDu5FF6GdMGJi=D_zP1zJoCQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAM9d7cjxSd9QJzTs1_s6Nh7c38FZ7_2FGPoCunvnmjX_y-+Dyg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAM9d7cjxSd9QJzTs1_s6Nh7c38FZ7_2FGPoCunvnmjX_y-+Dyg@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 08:45:03PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 9:57 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 2:04 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 09:32:24AM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yeah, I know.. but I couldn't come up with a better solution.
> > >
> > > Not been near a compiler, and haven't fully thought it through, but
> > > could something like the work work?
> >
> > Thanks for the patch, I think it'd work.  Let me test it
> > and get back to you.
> 
> I worked well but contained a typo.  See below.

Ha, typing hard ;-) I did say it hadn't been near a compiler ...

> Which way do you want to process this change?  Do I send it again
> with your S-o-b or will you apply it by yourself?  Either is fine, just
> let me know.  In case of latter, you can add

I'll go write me a Changelog and apply the thing, then we can forget
about things.