Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934207AbXKOXip (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 18:38:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934000AbXKOXia (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 18:38:30 -0500 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.152]:46822 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932478AbXKOXi3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 18:38:29 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:38:17 -0800 From: Gary Hade To: Alex Chiang Cc: Gary Hade , Matthew Wilcox , Greg KH , gregkh@suse.de, kristen.c.accardi@intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, rick.jones2@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5][RFC] Physical PCI slot objects Message-ID: <20071115233817.GD5928@us.ibm.com> References: <20071115004039.GC6269@us.ibm.com> <20071115173613.GG7541@ldl.fc.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071115173613.GG7541@ldl.fc.hp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1549 Lines: 51 On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 10:36:13AM -0700, Alex Chiang wrote: < snip > > Ok, so all that said, after re-implementing my ACPI-PCI slot > driver, we get all the correct answers, but with the additional > appearance of slots 1 and 2 (which aren't hotpluggable): Yea, looks much better. Nice to see that the addresses for slots below the p2p bridges now include the child instead of the parent bus number. :) < snip > > So if you could try out v2 of my patch series when you get access > to your machine back, I'd much appreciate it. Will do. It still looks like I will not get the box back until early next week. I will only be working Monday and Tuesday due to holiday/vacation but that will hopefully not be a problem. > I feel a lot better about it compared to v1. I haven't tried it yet but I feel better seeing that you are now testing on a system having a PCI topology that appears similar to some of our systems. < snip > > Here is some dmesg and lspci -vt output in case you want to > double-check my work: Well, I didn't see any obvious warts but I'm pretty skilled at missing problems when looking at that kind of info. Thanks, Gary -- Gary Hade System x Enablement IBM Linux Technology Center 503-578-4503 IBM T/L: 775-4503 garyhade@us.ibm.com http://www.ibm.com/linux/ltc - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/