Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:2 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:2;
Date:   Thu, 12 Oct 2023 15:36:28 +0100
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To:     Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
Cc:     Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] riscv: errata: thead: use riscv_nonstd_cache_ops
 for CMO
Message-ID: <20231012-remindful-coke-f9cfe950425f@spud>
References: <20231012141456.4078-1-jszhang@kernel.org>
 <ZSgA1BtMv/YDHzQX@xhacker>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yhohIoGoNmGJsGcL"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZSgA1BtMv/YDHzQX@xhacker>
Precedence: bulk


--yhohIoGoNmGJsGcL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 10:21:08PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 10:14:54PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > Previously, we use alternative mechanism to dynamically patch
> > the CMO operations for THEAD C906/C910 during boot for performance
> > reason. But as pointed out by Arnd, "there is already a significant
> > cost in accessing the invalidated cache lines afterwards, which is
> > likely going to be much higher than the cost of an indirect branch".
> > And indeed, there's no performance difference with GMAC and EMMC per
> > my test on Sipeed Lichee Pi 4A board.
> >=20
> > Use riscv_nonstd_cache_ops for THEAD C906/C910 CMO to simplify
> > the alternative code, and to acchieve Arnd's goal -- "I think
> > moving the THEAD ops at the same level as all nonstandard operations
> > makes sense, but I'd still leave CMO as an explicit fast path that
> > avoids the indirect branch. This seems like the right thing to do both
> > for readability and for platforms on which the indirect branch has a
> > noticeable overhead."
> >=20
> > To make bisect easy, I use two patches here: patch1 does the conversion
> > which just mimics current CMO behavior via. riscv_nonstd_cache_ops, I
> > assume no functionalities changes. patch2 uses T-HEAD PA based CMO
> > instructions so that we don't need to covert PA to VA.
> >=20
> > Hi Guo,
> >=20
> > I didn't use wback_inv for wback as you suggested during v1 reviewing,
> > this can be left as future optimizations.
> >=20
> > Thanks
> >=20
> > since v2:
> >   - collect Reviewed-by tag
>=20
> Oh, I missed the tag collection, but I know maintainers are using b4 whic=
h can
> collect and apply tags automatically ;). let me know if want a new
> version.

It doesn't collect tags (AFAIU) from earlier revisions though.

--yhohIoGoNmGJsGcL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZSgEbAAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0gDdAQDIEazfsbs4xfx2jNJUKGvwicJmPcJtkhPLURqghLYUgQEAwors/NUj/QyD
gd4wjd0Dg12NVYmAeaWwZ3XzoNOXYQw=
=/MRc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--yhohIoGoNmGJsGcL--