Received: by 2002:a05:7412:d8a:b0:e2:908c:2ebd with SMTP id b10csp570269rdg; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:09:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG1eAWQVer+OnHWESVtodmHWqIjlPSKa/+mAFfpNR1XlcI+DBLlwQXF9wfn6cmr+RKM1OpW X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:630a:b0:269:6c5:11a7 with SMTP id e10-20020a17090a630a00b0026906c511a7mr23086254pjj.17.1697144976040; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:09:36 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1697144976; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kE+c/DPtbqprYw+lTnhkGbKGoTRE+6t6QLYgCC8fXfrnA3h7gETLW9XSXt/tMz7jAf +u71NYZzdLFXVNovkvcCBOQaQyZhmRscUQgMfYOuTCbSsGWnLjK2eAATqHU1r+/h5Byl HZ1dL/SkrIBfjlOQ04nBxnHJIICzi5oUwQFHKfJQs7PTwh/y1KgrFyZmfFxPTx3C2HOK /ch6hVh/7JeDH7n4ckmRkgB3dR7+B7et/C3M9t0dBZLf8gUKW4pSYdVuoNCsWQcz2XI6 Vmef9Ah2F/KR5AUBxwXW4+uWDwbt9PMgLU/f5IPmr3utYcCMEj5MVCItZdA6ZsmIT184 qckw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:dkim-signature:dkim-filter; bh=5f4ZuSY/L+s9vY5S3iUWDxa4pn0Fv0h26nvn9vsXOh8=; fh=tMtDSXBRmdpSOn4ti7mV1+nEaDhPHgiD2CgDhlRieg0=; b=A4ygYkr1rMYuNJCMOWRBbcUPTWrCGYsVYRkyD5JeLxna0EN/BTjuaKtBVBO3NPwrIi o8EHbRrys79gNtN0S3tO64nQmLQQ2P+7kSCakKY6hJTOzPMfQQK14tCtVQ6zEIZpVWlG OLoaqkqeKWQU5jDS0+3LH9MtANoP2xd+mWzngldqPf/dQa3Kg56Z7p1FzQu/ViR1SCNr 9btVW14paG+8nA25g/c1Z+l30cnudIwjtxlnl7ENe/BNsNpnWD+inP2h+biv6dSvdY2T +A690n319cxS2DLirIztOnbrUjmmESO/lSIKNl3Xxc5LsLGed8O3BzCuNwWKoG/ghATJ A+RA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@zytor.com header.s=2023091101 header.b="CLH/fKVy"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=zytor.com Return-Path: Received: from morse.vger.email (morse.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::3:1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gx5-20020a17090b124500b002534f4ce2b6si2993104pjb.125.2023.10.12.14.09.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:09:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@zytor.com header.s=2023091101 header.b="CLH/fKVy"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=zytor.com Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by morse.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id C41FA83F69AC; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:09:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.10 at morse.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1442780AbjJLVJ2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 12 Oct 2023 17:09:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34030 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1442372AbjJLVJ1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Oct 2023 17:09:27 -0400 Received: from mail.zytor.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::138]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCA8CBB for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:09:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [IPV6:2601:646:9a00:1821:7c45:267e:5aad:82e7] ([IPv6:2601:646:9a00:1821:7c45:267e:5aad:82e7]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.zytor.com (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPSA id 39CL85OK1848892 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:08:37 -0700 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.zytor.com 39CL85OK1848892 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zytor.com; s=2023091101; t=1697144918; bh=5f4ZuSY/L+s9vY5S3iUWDxa4pn0Fv0h26nvn9vsXOh8=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=CLH/fKVyVCKi3f7nz9Xt95SNxAMKfTC56revfWZPlk7FnV0QxckBQRjosSB01pRaj vE0dTFncCytc2nDfXo3vhd12zuqb2J0YJ26/GCMIQQgLPYGgJ3vLO2ZKWd1O3K5wh7 NfzItHdBcD2s3YsmvY2z9W4WUXKJ3ShcL5o/Lipp4LKC7rAE0IMd8gHr5buq5rbbJ9 0BaHVfK1kpPsc9wq4tnTIVrIr+5BMMm17KiWAC/heWLcGyIX7PoJHUEDamDjOMLX7N LPHgK8ga6ttRod6tstkkY8BKRuHPXkkxJWeUMz4qEGkXbiGKJecOpU1OdE55BGgaLU AtBVNLtLfbSAQ== Message-ID: <5722e74b-6fc6-4d6e-be25-069ea6385990@zytor.com> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:08:00 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Introduce %rip-relative addressing to PER_CPU_VAR macro Content-Language: en-US To: Uros Bizjak , Dave Hansen Cc: x86@kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Juergen Gross , Boris Ostrovsky , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen References: <20231012201743.292149-1-ubizjak@gmail.com> <3af8dcec-66ec-4bd4-b7bf-4bc6f5f3c70f@intel.com> From: "H. Peter Anvin" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on morse.vger.email Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (morse.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 12 Oct 2023 14:09:33 -0700 (PDT) On 10/12/23 13:59, Uros Bizjak wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 10:53 PM Dave Hansen wrote: >> >> On 10/12/23 13:12, Uros Bizjak wrote: >>> The last patch introduces (%rip) suffix and uses it for x86_64 target, >>> resulting in a small code size decrease: text data bss dec hex filename >>> 25510677 4386685 808388 30705750 1d48856 vmlinux-new.o 25510629 4386685 >>> 808388 30705702 1d48826 vmlinux-old.o >> >> I feel like I'm missing some of the motivation here. >> >> 50 bytes is great and all, but it isn't without the cost of changing >> some rules and introducing potential PER_CPU_ARG() vs. PER_CPU_VAR() >> confusion. >> >> Are there some other side benefits? What else does this enable? > > These changes are necessary to build the kernel as Position > Independent Executable (PIE) on x86_64 [1]. And since I was working in > percpu area I thought that it was worth implementing them. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1682673542.git.houwenlong.hwl@antgroup.com/ > Are you PIC-adjusting the percpu variables as well? -hpa