Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:1;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20231013091831.60a032c2@canb.auug.org.au> <CACRpkdaEVUfFg-O53NBiyWPsjx0VZVMKK7o2ikUMSCy0_AJUGQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMuHMdX3LXZiRRAHSb1FU6nrgtPnyewbUwp7R9Rw2zbxziYz7w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACRpkdYNRyL-hywayP97PsLvhEk_Dm4HdnYHHo9N50GXMuxWCg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMuHMdUSirm9mxjRMEh3uBeo71smOwKfuvmSrq6TauCs664mmQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdUSirm9mxjRMEh3uBeo71smOwKfuvmSrq6TauCs664mmQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2023 10:58:55 +0200
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZPOoGkauvQkozp-B3Vi3J7Z8eNvncRYOpF9zMmMyXt5A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the pinctrl tree
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Ralph Siemsen <ralph.siemsen@linaro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 9:37=E2=80=AFAM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68=
k.org> wrote:


> > > The only difference is your added SoB?
> >
> > No, I'm not that vain...
>
> I don't see any other difference, though:

The difference is not in the commit, the difference is that the merge
commit is not
there, so it is a commit on top of my pile instead of v6.6-rc.

Yours,
Linus Walleij