Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:8 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:8;
Message-ID: <063395d4-16e5-8a56-1da3-5a04af3cdbce@ti.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2023 14:38:30 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.15.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v11 0/5] Enable Display for J784S4 and AM69-SK
 platform
To:     Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
        Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@ti.com>, <nm@ti.com>
CC:     <afd@ti.com>, <rogerq@kernel.org>, <s-vadapalli@ti.com>,
        <conor+dt@kernel.org>, <r-ravikumar@ti.com>, <sabiya.d@ti.com>,
        <kristo@kernel.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
References: <20231005132732.7462-1-j-choudhary@ti.com>
 <f8d0f807-a7b1-4f17-a3d3-c9ef694da238@ti.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1@ti.com>
In-Reply-To: <f8d0f807-a7b1-4f17-a3d3-c9ef694da238@ti.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 13/10/23 10:31, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote:
> 
> 
> On 05/10/23 18:57, Jayesh Choudhary wrote:
>> This series adds support for:
>> - DisplayPort for J784S4-EVM
>> - Displayport and HDMI for AM69-SK platform
>>
>> NOTE: Patch 4/5 introduces the following dtc warning which can be ignored
>> since its behind W=1 check:
>> Warning (graph_child_address): /bus@100000/dss@4a00000/ports: graph node
>> has single child node 'port@0', #address-cells/#size-cells are not
>> necessary
>>> (This is more accurate description for port and the dtc check should not
>> differentiate between port@0 and port@1.[0])
>>
> 
> Sorry, don't want to more warnings to the file while we are working
> constantly to reduce warnings on the other side. There are 3 options
> 
> a) Propose fix to dtc
> b) Minimally describe second port (DSI) and it keep disabled as its
> unusable currently (this more closely describes the HW and the reason
> why port indexing is needed in first place)
> c) Go back to v9 and describe second port once DSI supported is added in
> future,
> 
> [...]
> 

Posted a fix for the warning here,

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231013085424.7137-1-a-bhatia1@ti.com/

Regards
Aradhya