Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.31 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.31;
Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2023 11:22:32 +0200
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To:     Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
Cc:     jasowang@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, eperezma@redhat.com,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vdpa_sim: implement .reset_map support
Message-ID: <4o4yuuezigilikolv2paxb7icrsm3gdnj5aeoe47uotzju7xve@s5vqaafrppdv>
References: <1697185420-27213-1-git-send-email-si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1697185420-27213-1-git-send-email-si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Si-Wei,

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 01:23:40AM -0700, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
>RFC only. Not tested on vdpa-sim-blk with user virtual address.

I can test it, but what I should stress?

>Works fine with vdpa-sim-net which uses physical address to map.

Can you share your tests? so I'll try to do the same with blk.

>
>This patch is based on top of [1].
>
>[1] 
>https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/1696928580-7520-1-git-send-email-si-wei.liu@oracle.com/

The series does not apply well on master or vhost tree.
Where should I apply it?

If you have a tree with all of them applied, will be easy for me ;-)

Thanks,
Stefano