Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:3;
Date:   Fri, 13 Oct 2023 11:15:07 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 0/5] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: fix revid
 implementation
Message-ID: <20231013101507.GI8314@google.com>
References: <20231003152927.15000-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org>
 <169710605745.1174112.5043840678154728515.b4-ty@kernel.org>
 <ZSkUDl6bIQkArUO0@hovoldconsulting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <ZSkUDl6bIQkArUO0@hovoldconsulting.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 13 Oct 2023, Johan Hovold wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 11:20:57AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 03 Oct 2023 17:29:22 +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > The Qualcomm SPMI PMIC revid implementation is broken in multiple ways
> > > that can lead to resource leaks and crashes. This series reworks the
> > > implementation so that can be used safely.
> > > 
> > > Included is also a rename of the SPMI device lookup helper which can
> > > hopefully help prevent similar leaks from being reintroduced.
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > 
> > Applied, thanks!
> > 
> > [1/5] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: fix reference leaks in revid helper
> >       commit: 365cf70ff33fe20e749227346d7245f7f0dccb58
> > [2/5] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: fix revid implementation
> >       commit: 7370f9de463b1d21dcdf9480a0a15babecd14ac7
> > [3/5] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: switch to EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()
> >       commit: b5cd5e72a71e9d368e20271d3a772dd045ae220e
> 
> Thanks for picking these up, Lee. You don't seem to have pushed these
> out yet so I'm not sure if you intend to send them on for 6.6-rc or
> 6.7-rc1 yet.

Just pushed.  Should be in -next tomorrow.

These do not fix commits from this release and I'm not planning on
sending another PR for the current rcs, so these are due for v6.7-rc1.

> Either way, would it be possible to include also the related and
> dependant spmi cleanups?

With Acks, sure.

> Stephen, could you ack those changes so Lee can take them as well?


-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]