Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934176AbXKPW7A (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:59:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760159AbXKPW6w (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:58:52 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:43095 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757161AbXKPW6v (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:58:51 -0500 Message-ID: <473E209A.7080806@zytor.com> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:58:34 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sam Ravnborg CC: Andreas Herrmann , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kconfig: ARCH=x86 causes wrong utsname.machine References: <20071116111446.GA16968@devil> <20071116123747.GA12086@devil> <473DB52F.2040703@zytor.com> <20071116221535.GA1810@uranus.ravnborg.org> In-Reply-To: <20071116221535.GA1810@uranus.ravnborg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1415 Lines: 42 Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 07:20:15AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> Andreas Herrmann wrote: >>> The new ARCH=x86 kernel build causes weired machine strings on 32-bit. >>> For a cross-compiled kernel I have >>> >>> $ uname -m >>> x66_64 >>> >>> For a kernel natively built on a 32 bit machine I have >>> >>> $ uname -m >>> x66 >>> >>> Looking at the sources, I think that utsname->machine was initially >>> set as "x86_64" and "x86", respectively. >>> But in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c in check_bugs() the second character >>> is set to '6' on my K7. >>> >>> I think the right solution for that problem is to use "x86_64" as the >>> machine name for 64-bit and to keep the old "i[3456]86" strings for >>> 32-bit kernels. >> Absolutely. This would be userspace-visible ABI breakage. > > Any good suggestions here??? > UTS_MACHINE is set in top-level Makefile and if we specify > make ARCH=x86 > we do not know if i386 or x86_&4 is correct until the configuration > has been read. > > Should we report a "make ARCH=x86" as uname -m == x86?? > That would break 5 years of a stable ABI. I don't think that is even remotely feasible. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/