Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:1;
Message-ID: <7ce37af9-229f-445b-9505-10f5b0c60c89@infradead.org>
Date:   Sat, 14 Oct 2023 09:26:32 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Fixed multiple typos in multiple files
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc:     Muhammad Muzammil <m.muzzammilashraf@gmail.com>,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20231014123349.11294-1-m.muzzammilashraf@gmail.com>
 <b72324e4-75d2-4d90-9e6d-342d10bb947b@infradead.org>
 <ZSq3iuuGy7zSl4sz@casper.infradead.org>
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <ZSq3iuuGy7zSl4sz@casper.infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 10/14/23 08:45, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 08:31:35AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>  	/*
>>> -	 * The caller from rmap relay on disabled preemption becase they never
>>> +	 * The caller from rmap relay on disabled preemption because they never
>>>  	 * update their counter from in-interrupt context. For these two
>>
>> I don't know what that (partial) sentence is trying to say...
>> Maybe someone else does.
> 
> s/relay/rely/

Duh. Thanks.

So either:

+	 * The callers from rmap rely on disabled preemption because they never
or
+	 * The caller from rmap relies on disabled preemption because they never

but the entire paragraph still needs some care IMO.

-- 
~Randy