Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:7 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:7;
Date:   Mon, 16 Oct 2023 11:39:46 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To:     Rodrigo Siqueira Jordao <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Cc:     Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>,
        "Wentland, Harry" <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>,
        "Lei, Jun" <jun.lei@amd.com>,
        "Dhere, Chaitanya" <Chaitanya.Dhere@amd.com>,
        "Zhuo, Qingqing" <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
        Roman Li <roman.li@amd.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the amdgpu tree
Message-ID: <20231016113946.698ac2da@canb.auug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <cc75c480-5359-465e-adab-46b418ec5d97@amd.com>
References: <20231010124357.5251e100@canb.auug.org.au>
        <cc75c480-5359-465e-adab-46b418ec5d97@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/7nrd7C_Dkl+S6cV.1qwjW5z";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
Precedence: bulk

--Sig_/7nrd7C_Dkl+S6cV.1qwjW5z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Rodrigo,

On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 15:14:46 -0600 Rodrigo Siqueira Jordao <Rodrigo.Siqueir=
a@amd.com> wrote:
>
> I think I have a fix for that, but some things are unclear to me. I'm
> only able to see this issue when using allmodconfig. Additionally,
> when I inspected the function, it had a few local variables, not
> enough to explode the stack size fwiu. Is there any option in the
> allmodconfig that makes it easy to see this issue? Maybe something
> that I'm missing in my custom config file? Is it possible that
> allmodconfig enables some option that might increase the stack size?
> Perhaps the FPU flags from GCC include something else in the stack?
>=20
> Also, for investigating this issue, I'm considering the local
> variables, but as you can see from dml_core_mode_support, it has a
> few pointers. Am I missing something?

This could possibly be caused by inlining of other functions that are
static within the same file.

Other than that, I am also at a loss.
--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

--Sig_/7nrd7C_Dkl+S6cV.1qwjW5z
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmUshlIACgkQAVBC80lX
0GzEcAf7Brd4wjIjt7a98lqXoWjzZquWlVyJt8kE+RCpj36GhluBDDlWkPnGlJPH
aW1Sz7enwR+5UmSoiyCUdPT47TXZl28Y6hnLtZEnxBKGKyCNcl/H/XWlYZBxzLMk
ZK3SpSAEyx3YvBIdmaJk6M3bDZy73bjtqPoxX1vWXIVy23SQxfEkaBcVb2AD2znR
j/OqBHVpqxg3GXMs+2+YZ3mEFOvumzhXbCloWkyP3YMV3JuOFgApgavU3I9At811
Z5Gl8oIkT08F8N1ZMCP9HgyFvnRRS/YdTISHMafMqhjb0uC1nqy2pohf0+eBjeEy
5MYiTUwfYSIyA69IOe3I8YnMX8kdDA==
=1KBH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/7nrd7C_Dkl+S6cV.1qwjW5z--