Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.36 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.36;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20231011112726.166052-1-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
 <CAL_Jsq+HdceLczej4_q-wjg2870v3y-e_E+jEq0xbetDguaXAw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA8EJppCO-q=swYOH+O2fOdUDbNzd1yz9ZoTEBswV7RmvFJifA@mail.gmail.com> <20231016032353.xv3fm7dyuz52txy5@vireshk-i7>
In-Reply-To: <20231016032353.xv3fm7dyuz52txy5@vireshk-i7>
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 16 Oct 2023 07:21:56 +0300
Message-ID: <CAA8EJpqfxBMS9x9=kRFdZEduWVt6y4z0QMs0vFL9qvqKUoMjbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: export of_find_next_cache_node() for modules
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
        Ilia Lin <ilia.lin@kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 06:24, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 11-10-23, 15:59, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 at 15:52, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 6:27=E2=80=AFAM Dmitry Baryshkov
> > > <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The qcom-cpufreq-nvmem module uses of_find_next_cache_node() functi=
on,
> > > > so export it to be available to the modules.
> > >
> > > You really should be using the cacheinfo API which has already parsed
> > > the cache nodes.
> > >
> > > Also, why do you need a platform_device? I don't see a driver.
> > > cacheinfo already creates a struct device, so kind of weird to have 2
> > > devices.
> >
> > The driver is pending as a part of the series at [1]. We need to scale
> > the L2 supplies and clock frequency following the core frequency
> > changes.
>
> Guys, can we please resolve this soon ? I had to revert the patches
> for the time being to avoid these failures.

Rob pointed out that I should rework my code to use the cacheinfo
device for the L2 cache. This means that L2 device population should
be dropped from cpufreq. I'll post newer series as soon as I finish
the implementation.

--=20
With best wishes
Dmitry