Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.32 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.32;
Message-ID: <10f05b5a-8046-4884-b375-007a14248e00@quicinc.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Oct 2023 16:49:08 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] bus: mhi: host: Take irqsave lock after TRE is
 generated
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>, <mani@kernel.org>
CC:     <mhi@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <quic_cang@quicinc.com>,
        <quic_mrana@quicinc.com>, Hemant Kumar <quic_hemantk@quicinc.com>,
        "Lazarus Motha" <quic_lmotha@quicinc.com>
References: <1694594861-12691-1-git-send-email-quic_qianyu@quicinc.com>
 <1694594861-12691-3-git-send-email-quic_qianyu@quicinc.com>
 <e40a1dca-f23e-af32-320e-bf66a894bc6c@quicinc.com>
 <a82e188e-2d0e-7c0f-de54-79bbc4b6957b@quicinc.com>
 <6b396b1a-58a7-bf7c-f644-f1bf298a31e0@quicinc.com>
From:   Qiang Yu <quic_qianyu@quicinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <6b396b1a-58a7-bf7c-f644-f1bf298a31e0@quicinc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk


On 9/29/2023 11:25 PM, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On 9/24/2023 10:08 PM, Qiang Yu wrote:
>>
>> On 9/22/2023 10:50 PM, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
>>> On 9/13/2023 2:47 AM, Qiang Yu wrote:
>>>> From: Hemant Kumar <quic_hemantk@quicinc.com>
>>>>
>>>> Take irqsave lock after TRE is generated to avoid deadlock due to core
>>>> getting interrupts enabled as local_bh_enable must not be called with
>>>> irqs disabled based on upstream patch.
>>>
>>> Where is local_bh_enable() being called?  What patch?  What is 
>>> upstream of the codebase you submitted this to?  Why is it safe to 
>>> call mhi_gen_tre() without the lock?
>>
>> This patch is to fix the issue included by  "[PATCH v2 1/2] bus: mhi: 
>> host: Add spinlock to protect WP access when queueing TREs". In that 
>> patch, we add write_lock_bh/write_unlock_bh in mhi_gen_tre().
>>
>> However, before mhi_gen_tre() is invoked, mhi_cntrl->pm_lock is 
>> getted, line 1125, and it is a spin lock. So it becomes we want to 
>> get and release bh lock after spin lock. __local_bh_enable_ip is 
>> called as part of write_unlock_bh
>>
>> and local_bh_enable. When CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS is enabled, irq will 
>> be enabled once __local_bh_enable_ip is called. The commit message is 
>> not clear and confusing, will change it in [patch v3].
>>
>
> In addition to clarifying the commit message, I recommend looking at 
> adding this to the other patch.  It seems very odd to review a series 
> where one patch introduces a known issue, and a following patch 
> corrects that issue.  It would be better to not introduce the issue in 
> the first place.
OK, will squash two patches into one patch after we achieve an agreement.