Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:2 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:2;
Date:   Mon, 16 Oct 2023 15:35:38 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Sebastian Ott <sebott@redhat.com>
To:     Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
cc:     Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
        Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>,
        Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
        Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>,
        Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/12] KVM: arm64: PMU: Set PMCR_EL0.N for vCPU based
 on the associated PMU
In-Reply-To: <20231009230858.3444834-8-rananta@google.com>
Message-ID: <b4739328-5dba-a3a6-54ef-2db2d34201d8@redhat.com>
References: <20231009230858.3444834-1-rananta@google.com> <20231009230858.3444834-8-rananta@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 9 Oct 2023, Raghavendra Rao Ananta wrote:
> u64 kvm_vcpu_read_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> -	return __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0);
> +	u64 pmcr = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) &
> +			~(ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_MASK << ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT);
> +
> +	return pmcr | ((u64)vcpu->kvm->arch.pmcr_n << ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT);
> }
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index ff0f7095eaca..c750722fbe4a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -745,12 +745,8 @@ static u64 reset_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> {
> 	u64 pmcr;
>
> -	/* No PMU available, PMCR_EL0 may UNDEF... */
> -	if (!kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3())
> -		return 0;
> -
> 	/* Only preserve PMCR_EL0.N, and reset the rest to 0 */
> -	pmcr = read_sysreg(pmcr_el0) & (ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_MASK << ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT);
> +	pmcr = kvm_vcpu_read_pmcr(vcpu) & (ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_MASK << ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT);

pmcr = ((u64)vcpu->kvm->arch.pmcr_n << ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT);
Would that maybe make it more clear what is done here?