Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.36 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.36;
Date:   Mon, 16 Oct 2023 18:52:08 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc:     Youssef Esmat <youssefesmat@chromium.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, bsegall@google.com,
        mingo@kernel.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
        juri.lelli@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, mgorman@suse.de,
        bristot@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net, qyousef@layalina.io,
        chris.hyser@oracle.com, patrick.bellasi@matbug.net, pjt@google.com,
        pavel@ucw.cz, qperret@google.com, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com,
        joshdon@google.com, timj@gnu.org, kprateek.nayak@amd.com,
        yu.c.chen@intel.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, efault@gmx.de,
        tglx@linutronix.de, wuyun.abel@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/eevdf: Toggle eligibility through sched_feat
Message-ID: <20231016165208.GH33217@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20231013030213.2472697-1-youssefesmat@chromium.org>
 <20231015104428.GA11840@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20231016112851.5cc0ccad@gandalf.local.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20231016112851.5cc0ccad@gandalf.local.home>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 11:28:51AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> The main point is, our testing is not around any single benchmark that we
> are trying to make happy. We really are looking at what makes the user base
> run better in the real world.

This is a key (har-har) performance indicator for you guys though, I've
seen it mentioned before (with the core-scheduling crud IIRC).

As such it would be good to capture in a stand alone program and share.