Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758634AbXKQRZM (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Nov 2007 12:25:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752754AbXKQRY7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Nov 2007 12:24:59 -0500 Received: from ns4.abinetworks.biz ([216.218.212.66]:56343 "EHLO ns4.abinetworks.biz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751652AbXKQRY6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Nov 2007 12:24:58 -0500 Message-ID: <473F2464.3020905@abinetworks.biz> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:27:00 +0100 From: Gianluca Alberici User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gianluca Alberici CC: Trond Myklebust , markus reichelt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NFS Bug in 2.6.23 ? References: <473D6B5C.4090701@abinetworks.biz> <20071116121148.GI4290@tatooine.rebelbase.local> <1195222863.7653.18.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <473EEEC7.1070300@abinetworks.biz> In-Reply-To: <473EEEC7.1070300@abinetworks.biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1328 Lines: 54 Hello, I have found out something new about the cfs problem: 1) on a 2.6.20, working good: after starting cfs, nothing cattach'd: zeus:~# cat /proc/fs/nfsfs/volumes NV SERVER PORT DEV FSID v2 7f000001 be9 0:14 0:0 after cattaching (and at least once listing the directory, if not everything remains as above): zeus:~# cat /proc/fs/nfsfs/volumes NV SERVER PORT DEV FSID v2 7f000001 be9 0:14 0:0 v2 7f000001 be9 0:15 1:0 from now everything is OK forever.... 2) On 2.6.23 at cfsd restart mars:~# cat /proc/fs/nfsfs/volumes NV SERVER PORT DEV FSID v2 7f000001 be9 0:14 0:0 after cattaching i get mars:~# cat /proc/fs/nfsfs/volumes NV SERVER PORT DEV FSID v2 7f000001 be9 0:14 1:0 v2 7f000001 be9 0:15 1:0 The first FSID has chnaged and is 1:0 as the second while on 2.6.20 this doesnt happens. I know nothing about NFS internals but isnt strange to have the same FSID on 2 volumes ? BTW, the 2 machines have the same disk image. No diffs but the kernel. Maybe this means nothing, if so sorry for the noise. Gianluca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/