Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:1;
Date:   Mon, 16 Oct 2023 19:07:41 +0000
From:   Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To:     Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
Cc:     Sebastian Ott <sebott@redhat.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
        Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>,
        Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
        Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@google.com>,
        Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 10/12] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Introduce
 vpmu_counter_access test
Message-ID: <ZS2J_QbL0zYcsPhG@linux.dev>
References: <20231009230858.3444834-1-rananta@google.com>
 <20231009230858.3444834-11-rananta@google.com>
 <44608d30-c97a-c725-e8b2-0c5a81440869@redhat.com>
 <65b8bbdb-2187-3c85-0e5d-24befcf01333@redhat.com>
 <CAJHc60zPc6eM+t7pOM19aKbf_9cMvj_LnPnG1EO35=EP0jG+Tg@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZS2HTdhFO2aywPpe@linux.dev>
 <CAJHc60xFwcDu6e6GTY3WYowBxnbkCWU-EgwEOVGd4Qu5F_h10A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAJHc60xFwcDu6e6GTY3WYowBxnbkCWU-EgwEOVGd4Qu5F_h10A@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 12:05:16PM -0700, Raghavendra Rao Ananta wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 11:56 AM Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 02:05:29PM -0700, Raghavendra Rao Ananta wrote:
> > > Oliver,
> > >
> > > Aren't the selftest patches from the 'Enable writable ID regs' series
> > > [1] merged into kvmarm/next? Looking at the log, I couldn't find them
> > > and the last patch that went from the series was [2]. Am I missing
> > > something?
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > > Raghavendra
> > >
> > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/169644154288.3677537.15121340860793882283.b4-ty@linux.dev/
> > > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231003230408.3405722-11-oliver.upton@linux.dev/
> >
> > This is intentional, updating the tools headers as it was done in the
> > original series broke the perftool build. I backed out the selftest
> > patches, but took the rest of the kernel changes into kvmarm/next so
> > they could soak while we sort out the selftests mess. Hopefully we can
> > get the fix reviewed in time [*]...
> >
> > [*] https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20231011195740.3349631-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev/
> >
> > --
> Ah, I see. In that case, since it impacts this series, do you want me
> to rebase my series on top of your selftests series for v8?

No, please keep the two independent for now. I can fix it up when
applying the series.

-- 
Thanks,
Oliver