Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.34 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.34;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20231012152108.101270-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
 <169719833142.3828427.5236534342833939623.b4-ty@nvidia.com> <CAPDyKFpa4Wb2fXRS52cYa4=hs-K63y_Re52tS2VJsO9A31eZeA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFpa4Wb2fXRS52cYa4=hs-K63y_Re52tS2VJsO9A31eZeA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 17 Oct 2023 13:53:22 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFo6+QEA_C5HHs7pckqx=MRTKxmUWh+Pfar0E2Ve+1BWsw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 0/5] PM: domains: Drop pm_genpd_opp_to_performance_state()
To:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 at 11:57, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 at 13:59, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 17:21:08 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > Since commit 7c41cdcd3bbe ("OPP: Simplify the over-designed pstate <-> level
> > > dance"), there is no longer any users of the
> > > pm_genpd_opp_to_performance_state() API, while a few genpd providers are still
> > > assigning the redundant ->opp_to_performance_state() callback.
> > >
> > > Let's clean this up so we can drop pm_genpd_opp_to_performance_state() and the
> > > callback too.
> > >
> > > [...]
> >
> > Applied, thanks!
> >
> > [1/5] soc/tegra: pmc: Drop the ->opp_to_performance_state() callback
> >       commit: cda263907a6f88c75fb97cf7adecffaafb6237ec
>
> Thierry, I was planning to queue up the complete series through my
> pmdomain tree, my apologies if that wasn't clear. I want to get rid of
> the actual genpd API and the genpd callback altogether (patch5).
>
> Would it be possible for you to drop the above patch from your tree
> and provide an ack instead?

I just noticed that the above went has also been pulled into the soc
tree from your pull-request. So nevermind, I can do the final cleanup
later on.

Kind regards
Uffe