Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 23 Dec 2001 19:26:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 23 Dec 2001 19:26:16 -0500 Received: from hq2.fsmlabs.com ([209.155.42.199]:37393 "HELO hq2.fsmlabs.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 23 Dec 2001 19:26:06 -0500 Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 17:19:15 -0700 From: Victor Yodaiken To: Davide Libenzi Cc: george anzinger , lkml Subject: Re: [RFC] Scheduler issue 1, RT tasks ... Message-ID: <20011223171915.B19931@hq2> In-Reply-To: <3C22654D.7FC80713@mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Organization: FSM Labs Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 02:36:07PM -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > My understanding of the POSIX standard is the the highest priority > > task(s) are to get the cpu(s) using the standard calls. If you want to > > deviate from this I think the standard allows extensions, but they IMHO > > should be requested, not the default, so I would turn your flag around > > to force LOCAL, not GLOBAL. > > So, you're basically saying that for a better standard compliancy it's > better to have global preemption policy by default. And having users to > request rt tasks localization explicitly. It's fine for me. Can you please cite the passaaages in the standrd you have in mind? > > > > > - Davide > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/