Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 23 Dec 2001 19:58:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 23 Dec 2001 19:58:32 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:62728 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 23 Dec 2001 19:58:21 -0500 Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 22:58:05 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: James Bottomley Cc: , Subject: Re: [PATCH: NEW ARCHITECTURE FOR 2.5] support for NCR voyager 343x/345x/4100/51xx architecture In-Reply-To: <200112231913.fBNJDgt01933@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 23 Dec 2001, James Bottomley wrote: > The NCR voyager architecture is essentially a precursor ... One thing which worries me is that the number of these machines is very small, so the code could temporarily go the way the SGI visws code went. It would be nice if this code was split out in such a way that it won't have any impact on the maintainability of the mainstream code, so even if the voyager folks go on holiday, normal Linux development can continue and the resulting bitrot will be limited to just the voyager code. cheers, Rik -- Shortwave goes a long way: irc.starchat.net #swl http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/