Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756071AbXKSHPP (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 02:15:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752114AbXKSHPB (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 02:15:01 -0500 Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5]:41491 "EHLO grelber.thyrsus.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752189AbXKSHPA (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 02:15:00 -0500 From: Rob Landley Organization: Boundaries Unlimited To: Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: [Patch] Fix UML broken (was Re: User Mode Linux still broken in 2.6.23.1) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 01:14:55 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) Cc: Jeff Dike , Greg KH , WANG Cong , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Chris Wright References: <200711032351.52977.rob@landley.net> <200711181417.50745.rob@landley.net> <20071118213203.GA5696@uranus.ravnborg.org> In-Reply-To: <20071118213203.GA5696@uranus.ravnborg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200711190114.55604.rob@landley.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1319 Lines: 34 On Sunday 18 November 2007 15:32:03 Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 02:17:49PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > > On Saturday 17 November 2007 12:53:57 Jeff Dike wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:00:22PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > > > > I wasn't cc'd, and missed it. I'd like to test this, do you have a > > > > link? (Or a bit more specificity than "a few weeks ago"?) > > > > > > Here are the three patches: > > > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arch&m=119342916329510&w=2 > > > > Doesn't contain a patch. > > Took me one minute to locate PATCH 1 + 2: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arch&m=119342916429513&w=2 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arch&m=119342916229500&w=2 > > Maybe this helps you. Same problem as previous message: they don't apply to 2.6.23. (I tried both 2.6.23 and 2.6.23.8, just to be sure.) I don't suppose putting #ifndef guards around whatever sparc.h file hasn't got them is a reasonable hack to get this worked around during 2.6.23.x? Rob -- "One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code." - Ken Thompson. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/