Subject: Re: [patch 1/6] sclp: sysfs interface for SCLP cpi
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Reply-To: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
       Michael Ernst <mernst@de.ibm.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
In-Reply-To: <3ae72650711160708m1855eb18q3a986998cfd87a3f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20071116142942.978412023@de.ibm.com>
	 <20071116143320.980985765@de.ibm.com>
	 <3ae72650711160708m1855eb18q3a986998cfd87a3f@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: IBM Corporation
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:53:56 +0100
Message-Id: <1195462436.31281.3.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 998
Lines: 30

On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 16:08 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Nov 16, 2007 3:29 PM, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> > +
> > +static decl_subsys(cpi, NULL, NULL);
> > +
> 
> decl_subsys() and all other static kset cruft called "subsys" will be
> gone with 2.6.25.
> The patch series doing this is in -mm, and this patch will need
> (trivial) adaption to the
> new interfaces.

The "trainwreck" how Andrew has called it..
We have two git repositories with new code, both are against the
mainline git. After both repositories are merged we have push another
patch with the adaptions for the s390 code. The usual upstream fixing I
would say. Thanks for the hint.

-- 
blue skies,
  Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/