Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:2 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:2;
Date:   Wed, 18 Oct 2023 15:59:27 +0300
From:   Dorcas Litunya <anonolitunya@gmail.com>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Cc:     outreachy@lists.linux.dev, dan.carpenter@linaro.org,
        andi.shyti@linux.intel.com,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>,
        Teddy Wang <teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com>,
        linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] staging: sm750fb: Remove unused return value in
 program_mode_registers()
Message-ID: <ZS/Wr9ShnEe3umeY@dorcaslitunya-virtual-machine>
References: <cover.1697619623.git.anonolitunya@gmail.com>
 <492e63bbc58147fb534930ef9e1fb5d844ae8769.1697619623.git.anonolitunya@gmail.com>
 <4b7129ae-27f9-7ff4-845-9c327aff488c@inria.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4b7129ae-27f9-7ff4-845-9c327aff488c@inria.fr>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 02:06:41PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2023, Dorcas AnonoLitunya wrote:
> 
> > Modifies the return type of program_mode_registers()
> > to void from int as the return value is being ignored in
> > all subsequent function calls.
> >
> > This improves code readability and maintainability.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Dorcas AnonoLitunya <anonolitunya@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_mode.c | 5 ++---
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_mode.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_mode.c
> > index 83ace6cc9583..e15039238232 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_mode.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_mode.c
> > @@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ display_control_adjust_sm750le(struct mode_parameter *mode_param,
> >  }
> >
> >  /* only timing related registers will be  programed */
> > -static int program_mode_registers(struct mode_parameter *mode_param,
> > -				  struct pll_value *pll)
> > +static void program_mode_registers(struct mode_parameter *mode_param,
> > +				   struct pll_value *pll)
> >  {
> >  	int ret = 0;
> >  	int cnt = 0;
> > @@ -202,7 +202,6 @@ static int program_mode_registers(struct mode_parameter *mode_param,
> >  	} else {
> >  		ret = -1;
> 
> Is it still useful to have ret = -1?  Maybe the ret variable is not useful
> at all any more, but one would have to check the parts of the function
> that aren't shown.
>
I agree Julia. I will remove the setting part for ret = -1 but keep the
ret variable just in case it is being used by parts of the function not
shown. Thanks for the feedback.

Dorcas
> julia
> 
> >  	}
> > -	return ret;
> >  }
> >
> >  int ddk750_set_mode_timing(struct mode_parameter *parm, enum clock_type clock)
> > --
> > 2.42.0.345.gaab89be2eb
> >
> >