Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754988AbXKSOsy (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:48:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753383AbXKSOsq (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:48:46 -0500 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.152]:49695 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753273AbXKSOsp (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:48:45 -0500 Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:31:26 +0530 From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri To: Ingo Molnar Cc: dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, efault@gmx.de, skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Balbir Singh Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: Minor cleanups Message-ID: <20071119150126.GA24810@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20071119122713.GA28777@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20071119122828.GB28777@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20071119130803.GA31491@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071119130803.GA31491@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1462 Lines: 40 On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 02:08:03PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > #define for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) \ > > - list_for_each_entry(cfs_rq, &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list, leaf_cfs_rq_list) > > + list_for_each_entry_rcu(cfs_rq, &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list, leaf_cfs_rq_list) > > > > /* Do the two (enqueued) entities belong to the same group ? */ > > static inline int > > @@ -1126,7 +1126,10 @@ static void print_cfs_stats(struct seq_f > > #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED > > print_cfs_rq(m, cpu, &cpu_rq(cpu)->cfs); > > #endif > > + > > + rcu_read_lock(); > > for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(cpu_rq(cpu), cfs_rq) > > print_cfs_rq(m, cpu, cfs_rq); > > + rcu_read_unlock(); > > hm, why is this a cleanup? Sorry for the wrong subject. It was supposed to include the above bug fix, related to how we walk the task group list. Thinking abt it now, I realize that print_cfs_rq() can potentially sleep and hence it cannot be surrounded by rcu_read_lock()/unlock(). And as Dipankar just pointed me, sched_create/destroy_group aren't serialized at all currently, so we need a mutex to protect them. The same mutex can be then used when walking the list in print_cfs_stats() .. Will send update patches soon .. -- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/