Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:7 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:7;
Date:   Wed, 18 Oct 2023 17:52:23 +0200
From:   Michal =?utf-8?Q?Koutn=C3=BD?= <mkoutny@suse.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc:     Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@linux.intel.com>,
        "Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@google.com>,
        "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>,
        "Zhang, Bo" <zhanb@microsoft.com>,
        "linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org>,
        "cgroups@vger.kernel.org" <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
        "yangjie@microsoft.com" <yangjie@microsoft.com>,
        "dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        "Li, Zhiquan1" <zhiquan1.li@intel.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>,
        "anakrish@microsoft.com" <anakrish@microsoft.com>,
        "jarkko@kernel.org" <jarkko@kernel.org>,
        "hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        "mikko.ylinen@linux.intel.com" <mikko.ylinen@linux.intel.com>,
        "Mehta, Sohil" <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
        "bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
        "kristen@linux.intel.com" <kristen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/18] x86/sgx: Add EPC OOM path to forcefully reclaim
 EPC
Message-ID: <yz44wukoic3syy6s4fcrngagurkjhe2hzka6kvxbajdtro3fwu@zd2ilht7wcw3>
References: <op.2cxatlafwjvjmi@hhuan26-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <35a7fde056037a40b3b4b170e2ecd45bf8c4ba9f.camel@intel.com>
 <op.2cxmq7c2wjvjmi@hhuan26-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <915907d56861ef4aa7f9f68e0eb8d136a60bee39.camel@intel.com>
 <op.2cyma0e9wjvjmi@hhuan26-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <6lrq4xmk42zteq6thpyah7jy25rmvkp7mqxtll6sl7z62m7n4m@vrbbedtgxeq4>
 <op.2cztslnpwjvjmi@hhuan26-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <11413ca0-a8a9-4f73-8006-2e1231dbb390@intel.com>
 <op.2c0nt109wjvjmi@hhuan26-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <7a1a5125-9da2-47b6-ba0f-cf24d84df16b@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sfycubn7gx2ldoil"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7a1a5125-9da2-47b6-ba0f-cf24d84df16b@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk


--sfycubn7gx2ldoil
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 08:37:25AM -0700, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.co=
m> wrote:
> 1. Admin sets a limit
> 2. Enclave is created
> 3. Enclave hits limit, allocation fails

I was actually about to suggest reorganizing the series to a part
implementing this simple limiting and a subsequent part with the reclaim
stuff for easier digestability.=20

> Nothing else matters.

If the latter part is an unncessary overkill, it's even better.

Thanks,
Michal

--sfycubn7gx2ldoil
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYKAB0WIQQpEWyjXuwGT2dDBqAGvrMr/1gcjgUCZS//NQAKCRAGvrMr/1gc
jjuFAQD2xyk+E8YDQEiLZRkzZgLNNa9uj65olyt01GBofYgW0wD/WHDRxDomdgb3
KyYKGF1P6hM7GDWbgwRHcCg5PSgE/gE=
=+mep
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--sfycubn7gx2ldoil--