Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:6 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:6;
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To:     Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
        linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] bcachefs: Refactor memcpy into direct assignment
Date:   Wed, 18 Oct 2023 16:07:32 -0700
Message-Id: <20231018230728.make.202-kees@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

The memcpy() in bch2_bkey_append_ptr() is operating on an embedded fake
flexible array which looks to the compiler like it has 0 size. This
causes W=1 builds to emit warnings due to -Wstringop-overflow:

   In file included from include/linux/string.h:254,
                    from include/linux/bitmap.h:11,
                    from include/linux/cpumask.h:12,
                    from include/linux/smp.h:13,
                    from include/linux/lockdep.h:14,
                    from include/linux/radix-tree.h:14,
                    from include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h:6,
                    from fs/bcachefs/bcachefs.h:182:
   fs/bcachefs/extents.c: In function 'bch2_bkey_append_ptr':
   include/linux/fortify-string.h:57:33: warning: writing 8 bytes into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
      57 | #define __underlying_memcpy     __builtin_memcpy
         |                                 ^
   include/linux/fortify-string.h:648:9: note: in expansion of macro '__underlying_memcpy'
     648 |         __underlying_##op(p, q, __fortify_size);                        \
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/fortify-string.h:693:26: note: in expansion of macro '__fortify_memcpy_chk'
     693 | #define memcpy(p, q, s)  __fortify_memcpy_chk(p, q, s,                  \
         |                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   fs/bcachefs/extents.c:235:17: note: in expansion of macro 'memcpy'
     235 |                 memcpy((void *) &k->v + bkey_val_bytes(&k->k),
         |                 ^~~~~~
   fs/bcachefs/bcachefs_format.h:287:33: note: destination object 'v' of size 0
     287 |                 struct bch_val  v;
         |                                 ^

Avoid making any structure changes and just replace the u64 copy into a
direct assignment, side-stepping the entire problem.

Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-bcachefs@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309192314.VBsjiIm5-lkp@intel.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231010235609.work.594-kees@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
v3 - replace memcpy with assignment
v2 - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231016212735.it.314-kees@kernel.org
v1 - https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231010235609.work.594-kees@kernel.org
---
 fs/bcachefs/extents.h | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/extents.h b/fs/bcachefs/extents.h
index 7ee8d031bb6c..8c09c527fc4f 100644
--- a/fs/bcachefs/extents.h
+++ b/fs/bcachefs/extents.h
@@ -632,6 +632,8 @@ void bch2_bkey_extent_entry_drop(struct bkey_i *, union bch_extent_entry *);
 
 static inline void bch2_bkey_append_ptr(struct bkey_i *k, struct bch_extent_ptr ptr)
 {
+	struct bch_extent_ptr *dest;
+
 	EBUG_ON(bch2_bkey_has_device(bkey_i_to_s(k), ptr.dev));
 
 	switch (k->k.type) {
@@ -641,10 +643,8 @@ static inline void bch2_bkey_append_ptr(struct bkey_i *k, struct bch_extent_ptr
 		EBUG_ON(bkey_val_u64s(&k->k) >= BKEY_EXTENT_VAL_U64s_MAX);
 
 		ptr.type = 1 << BCH_EXTENT_ENTRY_ptr;
-
-		memcpy((void *) &k->v + bkey_val_bytes(&k->k),
-		       &ptr,
-		       sizeof(ptr));
+		dest = (struct bch_extent_ptr *)((void *) &k->v + bkey_val_bytes(&k->k));
+		*dest = ptr;
 		k->k.u64s++;
 		break;
 	default:
-- 
2.34.1