Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:00:57 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
       dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, efault@gmx.de,
       skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: Improve fairness of cpu allocation for task
	groups
Message-ID: <20071119190057.GA12650@elte.hu>
References: <20071119122713.GA28777@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20071119123051.GC28777@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20071119131201.GB31491@elte.hu> <20071119150312.GA2365@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20071119152258.GB31426@elte.hu> <20071119160647.GV3359@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20071119160647.GV3359@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 754
Lines: 20


* Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> > ok, as long as it's NOP for the CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED, we could 
> > try it.
> 
> Ok ..thx. I was begining to make changes to avoid even the above minor 
> changes for !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED case, but it doesn't look neat, 
> hence will drop that effort.

well please try it nevertheless, if the changes are not a NOP for the 
!FAIR_GROUP_SCHED case it's harder to determine that they are indeed 
harmless for the !FAIR_GROUP_SCHED case.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/