Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.37 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.37;
From:   Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
To:     Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.cz>,
        "Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com>,
        K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/25] timer: Move from a push remote at enqueue to a
 pull at expiry model
In-Reply-To: <1891aa6c-037f-46a1-9584-17aaa63e4e74@arm.com>
References: <20231004123454.15691-1-anna-maria@linutronix.de>
 <1891aa6c-037f-46a1-9584-17aaa63e4e74@arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Oct 2023 16:04:19 +0200
Message-ID: <87fs26909o.fsf@somnus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Hi Lukasz,

Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> writes:

[...]

>
> I have tested this on my 2 Arm boards with mainline kernel
> and almost-mainline. On both platforms it looks stable.
> The results w/ your patchset looks better.
>

Thanks for testing!

[...]

> The performance looks good. Only one test 'Speedometer'
> has some interesting lower score.

Is it required to look into this more detailed or is the regression in a
acceptable range for you?

>
> Fill free to add:
>
> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>

Thanks,

	Anna-Maria