Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:7 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:7;
Date:   Thu, 19 Oct 2023 19:54:29 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Andreas Klinger <ak@it-klinger.de>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
        Angel Iglesias <ang.iglesiasg@gmail.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Sergei Korolev <dssoftsk@gmail.com>, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: bmp280: fix eoc interrupt usage
Message-ID: <ZTFfRaShatWdxGB9@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20231018152816.56589-1-ak@it-klinger.de>
 <20231019162209.18872-1-ak@it-klinger.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20231019162209.18872-1-ak@it-klinger.de>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 06:22:09PM +0200, Andreas Klinger wrote:
> Only the bmp085 can have an End-Of-Conversion (EOC) interrupt. But the
> bmp085 and bmp180 share the same chip id. Therefore it's necessary to
> distinguish the case in which the interrupt is set.
> 
> Fix the if statement so that only when the interrupt is set and the chip
> id is recognized the interrupt is requested.
> 
> This bug exists since the support of EOC interrupt was introduced.

> Fixes: aae953949651 ("iio: pressure: bmp280: add support for BMP085 EOC interrupt")

As Jonathan already commented, this is part of a tag block below...

> Also add a link to bmp085 datasheet for reference.
> 

...somewhere here.

> Suggested-by: Sergei Korolev <dssoftsk@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Klinger <ak@it-klinger.de>
> ---
>  v1 -> v2: Remove extra space (seen by Andy)


And seems Jonathan mentioned that this is already fixed in his tree.
Did I understand that correctly?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko