Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755578AbXKSWcv (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:32:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752158AbXKSWco (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:32:44 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:45241 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750704AbXKSWcn (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:32:43 -0500 Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:32:41 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20071119.143241.165308264.davem@davemloft.net> To: david-b@pacbell.net Cc: stern@rowland.harvard.edu, zwane@arm.linux.org.uk, tytso@mit.edu, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, stable@kernel.org, reviews@ml.cw.f00f.org, rdunlap@xenotime.net, mkrufky@linuxtv.org, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jmforbes@linuxtx.org, gregkh@suse.de, dely.l.sy@intel.com, davej@redhat.com, chuckw@quantumlinux.com, cebbert@redhat.com, cavokz@gmail.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [patch 19/26] USB: mutual exclusion for EHCI init and port resets From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20071119195955.B0C482214F3@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net> References: <20071119195955.B0C482214F3@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 931 Lines: 24 From: David Brownell Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:59:55 -0800 > > This addition certainly won't hurt. Did we ever get any feedback as to > > whether it actually helped? > > ISTR that davem refused to try it, after reporting an > intermittent failure on the original patch (which only > addresses one end of that hardware race). > > So, no ... but given we know that closing only one side > of the race isn't quite enough, I think we need it anyway. I think we should put all these changes in because at a minimum it's a step in the right direction even if it doesn't close the hole %100. So please let's merge the mutex and the msleep() change in ASAP, thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/