Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755776AbXKSXA7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:00:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754896AbXKSXAo (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:00:44 -0500 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:37634 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754779AbXKSXAn (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:00:43 -0500 Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:52:10 -0800 From: Greg KH To: David Miller Cc: david-b@pacbell.net, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, zwane@arm.linux.org.uk, tytso@mit.edu, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, stable@kernel.org, reviews@ml.cw.f00f.org, rdunlap@xenotime.net, mkrufky@linuxtv.org, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jmforbes@linuxtx.org, dely.l.sy@intel.com, davej@redhat.com, chuckw@quantumlinux.com, cebbert@redhat.com, cavokz@gmail.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [patch 19/26] USB: mutual exclusion for EHCI init and port resets Message-ID: <20071119225210.GA23798@suse.de> References: <20071119195955.B0C482214F3@adsl-69-226-248-13.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net> <20071119.143241.165308264.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071119.143241.165308264.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1168 Lines: 32 On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 02:32:41PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: David Brownell > Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:59:55 -0800 > > > > This addition certainly won't hurt. Did we ever get any feedback as to > > > whether it actually helped? > > > > ISTR that davem refused to try it, after reporting an > > intermittent failure on the original patch (which only > > addresses one end of that hardware race). > > > > So, no ... but given we know that closing only one side > > of the race isn't quite enough, I think we need it anyway. > > I think we should put all these changes in because at a minimum > it's a step in the right direction even if it doesn't close > the hole %100. > > So please let's merge the mutex and the msleep() change in > ASAP, thanks. The msleep one is queued up for the next Linus pull, and after it goes in, I'll add it to the -stable trees as well. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/