Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 24 Dec 2001 06:03:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 24 Dec 2001 06:03:12 -0500 Received: from mail.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.2]:5138 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 24 Dec 2001 06:02:58 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Keith Owens To: Kai Germaschewski Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H . J . Lu" Subject: Re: How to fix false positives on references to discarded text/data? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 24 Dec 2001 11:05:00 BST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 22:02:45 +1100 Message-ID: <29350.1009191765@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 24 Dec 2001 11:05:00 +0100 (CET), Kai Germaschewski wrote: >According to my reading of the docs and also to my testing, .subsection 0 >and .previous should be equivalent here. But .subsection 0 may be cleaner. As I read the gas info text, .subsection changes the current entry on top of stack, it does not stack a new section/subsection pair. .previous swaps the top of stack with the previous top of stack. I suspect that you would get different results if there was more than one section on the stack. In any case, .subsection 0 is "obviously correct". - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/