Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.32 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.32;
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, x86@kernel.org
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
        Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
        Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
        Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
        "Kalra, Ashish" <ashish.kalra@amd.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
        kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCHv2 10/13] x86/mm: Make e820_end_ram_pfn() cover E820_TYPE_ACPI ranges
Date:   Fri, 20 Oct 2023 18:12:39 +0300
Message-ID: <20231020151242.1814-11-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20231020151242.1814-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
References: <20231020151242.1814-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

e820__end_of_ram_pfn() is used to calculate max_pfn which, among other
things, guides where direct mapping ends. Any memory above max_pfn is
not going to be present in the direct mapping.

e820__end_of_ram_pfn() finds the end of the ram based on the highest
E820_TYPE_RAM range. But it doesn't includes E820_TYPE_ACPI ranges into
calculation.

Despite the name, E820_TYPE_ACPI covers not only ACPI data, but also EFI
tables and might be required by kernel to function properly.

Usually the problem is hidden because there is some E820_TYPE_RAM memory
above E820_TYPE_ACPI. But crashkernel only presents pre-allocated crash
memory as E820_TYPE_RAM on boot. If the preallocated range is small, it
can fit under the last E820_TYPE_ACPI range.

Modify e820__end_of_ram_pfn() and e820__end_of_low_ram_pfn() to cover
E820_TYPE_ACPI memory.

The problem was discovered during debugging kexec for TDX guest. TDX
guest uses E820_TYPE_ACPI to store the unaccepted memory bitmap and pass
it between the kernels on kexec.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
index fb8cf953380d..99c80680dc9e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
@@ -827,7 +827,7 @@ u64 __init e820__memblock_alloc_reserved(u64 size, u64 align)
 /*
  * Find the highest page frame number we have available
  */
-static unsigned long __init e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn, enum e820_type type)
+static unsigned long __init e820_end_ram_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn)
 {
 	int i;
 	unsigned long last_pfn = 0;
@@ -838,7 +838,8 @@ static unsigned long __init e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn, enum e820_type
 		unsigned long start_pfn;
 		unsigned long end_pfn;
 
-		if (entry->type != type)
+		if (entry->type != E820_TYPE_RAM &&
+		    entry->type != E820_TYPE_ACPI)
 			continue;
 
 		start_pfn = entry->addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
@@ -864,12 +865,12 @@ static unsigned long __init e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn, enum e820_type
 
 unsigned long __init e820__end_of_ram_pfn(void)
 {
-	return e820_end_pfn(MAX_ARCH_PFN, E820_TYPE_RAM);
+	return e820_end_ram_pfn(MAX_ARCH_PFN);
 }
 
 unsigned long __init e820__end_of_low_ram_pfn(void)
 {
-	return e820_end_pfn(1UL << (32 - PAGE_SHIFT), E820_TYPE_RAM);
+	return e820_end_ram_pfn(1UL << (32 - PAGE_SHIFT));
 }
 
 static void __init early_panic(char *msg)
-- 
2.41.0