Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:4 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:4;
Date:   Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:41:15 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
CC:     James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        <loongarch@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
        <x86@kernel.org>, Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
        <jianyong.wu@arm.com>, <justin.he@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 13/35] ACPI: Rename
 acpi_scan_device_not_present() to be about enumeration
Message-ID: <20231020174115.0000045a@Huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <ZTKkWozjprMYLjay@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
References: <20230913163823.7880-1-james.morse@arm.com>
        <20230913163823.7880-14-james.morse@arm.com>
        <ZTKkWozjprMYLjay@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:01:30 +0100
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 04:38:01PM +0000, James Morse wrote:
> > acpi_scan_device_not_present() is called when a device in the
> > hierarchy is not available for enumeration. Historically enumeration
> > was only based on whether the device was present.
> > 
> > To add support for only enumerating devices that are both present
> > and enabled, this helper should be renamed. It was only ever about
> > enumeration, rename it acpi_scan_device_not_enumerated().
> > 
> > No change in behaviour is intended.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>  
> 
> Is this another patch which ought to be submitted without waiting
> for the rest of the series?
> 
> Thanks.
> 

Looks like a valid standalone change to me.