Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:2 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:2;
Date:   Fri, 20 Oct 2023 21:11:48 +0300
From:   Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        len.brown@intel.com, robert.moore@intel.com,
        mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
        will@kernel.org, linux@roeck-us.net, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        acpica-devel@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
        mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@intel.com, bala.senthil@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/8] ACPI: utils: use acpi_dev_uid_match() for
 matching _UID
Message-ID: <ZTLC5Jo97gYsL5wX@black.fi.intel.com>
References: <20231020084732.17130-1-raag.jadav@intel.com>
 <20231020084732.17130-5-raag.jadav@intel.com>
 <ZTJYK02w8HZg26eI@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <ZTJmnv6CsZUt0pIS@black.fi.intel.com>
 <CAJZ5v0jvAeibnXSq92CBd1uXUgRnvsP0kEqfL8Du552=LT1dog@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0jvAeibnXSq92CBd1uXUgRnvsP0kEqfL8Du552=LT1dog@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 07:11:53PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 1:38 PM Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 01:36:27PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 02:17:28PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > > > Convert manual _UID references to use standard ACPI helpers.
> > >
> > > Yes, while not so obvious this is the correct replacement.
> > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > I think this is the only case which would suffer from the more obvious
> > behaviour, i.e.
> >
> > bool acpi_dev_uid_match(struct acpi_device *adev, const char *uid2)
> > {
> >         const char *uid1 = acpi_device_uid(adev);
> >
> >         return uid1 && uid2 && !strcmp(uid1, uid2);
> > }
> >
> > That said, we can't be particularly sure about it's potential future users,
> > especially when the usage will not be limited to just ACPI core since we're
> > exporting it.
> 
> I actually agree with this, so please switch over to the above.

Will send out a v2, thanks.

Andy, can I add your review for this?

Raag