Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:1;
Date:   Sat, 21 Oct 2023 16:45:46 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Nandha Kumar Singaram <nandhakumar.singaram@gmail.com>
Cc:     Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>,
        greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kumaran.4353@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: Alignment should match open parenthesis
Message-ID: <2023102147-educator-worry-06f4@gregkh>
References: <20231021133527.GB12776@ubuntu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20231021133527.GB12776@ubuntu>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 06:35:27AM -0700, Nandha Kumar Singaram wrote:
> greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kumaran.4353@gmail.com
> Bcc: 
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> Reply-To: 
> In-Reply-To: <2023102131-slacker-lily-28ff@gregkh>
> 
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 11:48:32AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 02:39:49PM -0700, Nandha Kumar Singaram wrote:
> > > Adhere to linux coding style. Reported by checkpatch.pl:
> > > CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Nandha Kumar Singaram <nandhakumar.singaram@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c | 14 +++++++-------
> > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c
> > > index cdbb42cd413b..405c8e78aa72 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/camera.c
> > > @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static int gb_camera_operation_sync_flags(struct gb_connection *connection,
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static int gb_camera_get_max_pkt_size(struct gb_camera *gcam,
> > > -		struct gb_camera_configure_streams_response *resp)
> > > +				      struct gb_camera_configure_streams_response *resp)
> > >  {
> > >  	unsigned int max_pkt_size = 0;
> > >  	unsigned int i;
> > > @@ -267,8 +267,7 @@ static int gb_camera_get_max_pkt_size(struct gb_camera *gcam,
> > >   * Validate the stream configuration response verifying padding is correctly
> > >   * set and the returned number of streams is supported
> > >   */
> > > -static const int gb_camera_configure_streams_validate_response(
> > > -		struct gb_camera *gcam,
> > > +static const int gb_camera_configure_streams_validate_response(struct gb_camera *gcam,
> > 
> > Why change this line?
> >
> did these Code change to fix CHECK: Lines should not end with a '(' reported by
> checkpatch.pl

That's great, but you didn't say that in your changelog text, so it
looks wrong here :(

thanks,

greg k-h