Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.37 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.37;
Date:   Sat, 21 Oct 2023 13:07:25 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To:     Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc:     Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@huaweicloud.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>,
        Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr>,
        Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>,
        Daniel Lustig <dlustig@nvidia.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH memory-model] docs: memory-barriers: Add note on compiler
 transformation and address deps
Message-ID: <f8d82079-bd45-428f-ab3b-593fd3757baf@paulmck-laptop>
Reply-To: paulmck@kernel.org
References: <4110a58a-8db5-57c4-2f5a-e09ee054baaa@huaweicloud.com>
 <1c731fdc-9383-21f2-b2d0-2c879b382687@huaweicloud.com>
 <f363d6e0-5682-43e7-9a3f-6b896c3cd920@paulmck-laptop>
 <b96cfbc1-f6b0-2fa6-b72d-d57c34bbf14b@huaweicloud.com>
 <2694e6e1-3282-4a69-b955-06afd7d7f87f@paulmck-laptop>
 <0bf4cda3-cc43-0e77-e47b-43e1402ed276@huaweicloud.com>
 <79233008-4be2-4442-9600-f9ac1a654312@paulmck-laptop>
 <591279ff-3316-d64b-8b25-6baefcecaad1@huaweicloud.com>
 <8f2ed577-424a-4114-8c90-90ba657e08db@paulmck-laptop>
 <e9aa4f00-1db8-44a7-aa1f-122cdeeecc23@rowland.harvard.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e9aa4f00-1db8-44a7-aa1f-122cdeeecc23@rowland.harvard.edu>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 12:03:30PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 08:10:27AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 03:36:21PM +0200, Jonas Oberhauser wrote:
> > > 
> > > Am 10/20/2023 um 8:13 PM schrieb Paul E. McKenney:
> > > > Fair enough in general, but I cannot promise to never confuse people.
> > > > This is after all memory ordering.  And different people will be confused
> > > > by different things.
> > > 
> > > You can say that twice. In fact I suspect this is not the first time you say
> > > that :))
> > 
> > Easy for me to say, "that that that that that that that that that that"!
> 
> This reminds me of a sentence I once heard as an example of 
> inscrutability.  Written without punctuation, it goes:
> 
> 	Jack when Joe had had had had had had had had had had
> 	the teachers approval.
> 
> Properly punctuated, it says:
> 
> 	Jack, when Joe had had "had", had had "had had"; "had had" had 
> 	the teacher's approval.
> 
> The context is supposed to be a comparison of the words two students 
> used in their essays and how their teacher reacted.  It actually 
> makes sense when read carefully.

Cute!

In contrast, any sensible interpretationof my string of "that"s is
pure coincidence.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul