Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:7 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:7;
Date:   Mon, 23 Oct 2023 09:05:44 +0200
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc:     Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Subject: Need SPMI ack (was: Re: (subset) [PATCH 0/5] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic:
 fix revid implementation)
Message-ID: <ZTYbSAYDi4KUEFZa@hovoldconsulting.com>
References: <20231003152927.15000-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org>
 <169710605745.1174112.5043840678154728515.b4-ty@kernel.org>
 <ZSkUDl6bIQkArUO0@hovoldconsulting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZSkUDl6bIQkArUO0@hovoldconsulting.com>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Stephen,

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 11:55:27AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 11:20:57AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 03 Oct 2023 17:29:22 +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > The Qualcomm SPMI PMIC revid implementation is broken in multiple ways
> > > that can lead to resource leaks and crashes. This series reworks the
> > > implementation so that can be used safely.
> > > 
> > > Included is also a rename of the SPMI device lookup helper which can
> > > hopefully help prevent similar leaks from being reintroduced.
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > 
> > Applied, thanks!
> > 
> > [1/5] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: fix reference leaks in revid helper
> >       commit: 365cf70ff33fe20e749227346d7245f7f0dccb58
> > [2/5] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: fix revid implementation
> >       commit: 7370f9de463b1d21dcdf9480a0a15babecd14ac7
> > [3/5] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: switch to EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()
> >       commit: b5cd5e72a71e9d368e20271d3a772dd045ae220e
> 
> Thanks for picking these up, Lee. You don't seem to have pushed these
> out yet so I'm not sure if you intend to send them on for 6.6-rc or
> 6.7-rc1 yet.
> 
> Either way, would it be possible to include also the related and
> dependant spmi cleanups?
> 
> Stephen, could you ack those changes so Lee can take them as well?

Could you please consider acking the two SPMI patches so that they can
go in through Lee's tree along with the rest of the series for 6.7-rc1
(e.g. to avoid dealing with inter-tree dependencies)?

Johan