Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 00:48:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 00:48:23 -0500 Received: from [61.143.56.20] ([61.143.56.20]:24243 "EHLO mario.zsu.edu.cn") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 00:48:10 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 14:01:12 +0800 From: isp01ljl@taurus.zsu.edu.cn X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53 RC/5) Reply-To: isp01ljl@taurus.zsu.edu.cn Organization: stu X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <586590797.20001228140112@student.zsu.edu.cn> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: whether the thread is implemented in the kernel ? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Filter-Version: 1.7 (fw.zsu.edu.cn) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello all , I encountered a interesting problem , that is whether the thread is implemented in the kernel ? if yes , then what is the system call to generate a thread ? is it similar to fork() ? thanks ... happy new year ! -- Best regards, LucidaS mailto:isp01ljl@student.zsu.edu.cn - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/