Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:1;
Date:   Mon, 23 Oct 2023 09:44:50 +0100
From:   "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To:     Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc:     James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
        x86@kernel.org, Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
        jianyong.wu@arm.com, justin.he@arm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 24/35] drivers: base: Implement weak
 arch_unregister_cpu()
Message-ID: <ZTYygtKt4w9C0Oxw@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
References: <20230913163823.7880-1-james.morse@arm.com>
 <20230913163823.7880-25-james.morse@arm.com>
 <8be3a9dc-8f59-9ef9-3662-95814e177125@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8be3a9dc-8f59-9ef9-3662-95814e177125@redhat.com>
Sender: Russell King (Oracle) <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:59:23AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On 9/14/23 02:38, James Morse wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> > index 677f963e02ce..c709747c4a18 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/cpu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c
> > @@ -531,7 +531,14 @@ int __weak arch_register_cpu(int cpu)
> >   {
> >   	return register_cpu(&per_cpu(cpu_devices, cpu), cpu);
> >   }
> > -#endif
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> > +void __weak arch_unregister_cpu(int num)
> > +{
> > +	unregister_cpu(&per_cpu(cpu_devices, num));
> > +}
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES */
> 
> It seems conflicting with its declaration in include/linux/cpu.h.

How so? The declaration is:

extern void arch_unregister_cpu(int cpu);

So:

void __weak arch_unregister_cpu(int num)

is compatible.

> Besides, the function is still needed by
> drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c::acpi_processor_make_not_present()
> even both CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU and CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES are disabled?

Yes, I agree - it needs to be present when ACPI is built, so I'm
thinking the right solution is to move it out from under at least
CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU.

It can't be moved out from under CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES because
then we end up referencing the per-cpu variable cpu_devices which only
exists when CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES is enabled. Is that a problem
though, because in the case of !CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES, aren't
architectures required to provide both arch_.*register_cpu() functions?

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!