Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.38 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.38;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20231014123349.11294-1-m.muzzammilashraf@gmail.com>
 <b72324e4-75d2-4d90-9e6d-342d10bb947b@infradead.org> <ZSq3iuuGy7zSl4sz@casper.infradead.org>
 <721f24eb6532290c6c4ab4e6d5a50bf8637fcd94.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
 <CAJHePoZVMMCcUNKbg5f9VrYo-x5E_rU1piQGHi67ZuY4Pyj4bg@mail.gmail.com> <5cd5b88ec8f4500a716aa8b96d27d44e96ed65bf.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
In-Reply-To: <5cd5b88ec8f4500a716aa8b96d27d44e96ed65bf.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
From:   Muhammad Muzammil <m.muzzammilashraf@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Oct 2023 16:08:49 +0500
Message-ID: <CAJHePoayC+RUk4gCCYACRXguuXfeWFvg5cyiCwNi-YxC3-UOLw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Fixed multiple typos in multiple files
To:     James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

Can anyone approve this patch?

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 7:27=E2=80=AFAM James Bottomley
<James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2023-10-15 at 10:45 +0500, Muhammad Muzammil wrote:
> > should I create the v2 or this patch is fine?
>
> Personally, I don't think anyone cares about misspellings unless it
> obscures the meaning of the sentence, so, given the interactions in
> this thread, I'd argue the only one really worth fixing is relay ->
> relies.
>
> James
>
>
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 9:27=E2=80=AFPM James Bottomley
> > <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2023-10-14 at 16:45 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 08:31:35AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > > > >         /*
> > > > > > -        * The caller from rmap relay on disabled preemption
> > > > > > becase they never
> > > > > > +        * The caller from rmap relay on disabled preemption
> > > > > > because they never
> > > > > >          * update their counter from in-interrupt context.
> > > > > > For
> > > > > > these two
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't know what that (partial) sentence is trying to say...
> > > > > Maybe someone else does.
> > > >
> > > > s/relay/rely/
> > >
> > > relies, surely, being the correct third person singular form of the
> > > verb to match the nominative noun "the caller".
> > >
> > > James
> > >
> >
>