Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759221AbXKTIQx (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Nov 2007 03:16:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755505AbXKTIQq (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Nov 2007 03:16:46 -0500 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:53643 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755364AbXKTIQp (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Nov 2007 03:16:45 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:16:24 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Scott James Remnant Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov , Roland McGrath Subject: Re: [PATCH] wait_task_stopped: pass correct exit_code to wait_noreap_copyout Message-Id: <20071120001624.83c7fbce.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1195545322.14510.170.camel@wing-commander> References: <1195377204.6070.3.camel@wing-commander> <20071119224326.198f77a0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1195545322.14510.170.camel@wing-commander> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1372 Lines: 30 On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:55:22 +0000 Scott James Remnant wrote: > On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 22:43 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 09:13:24 +0000 Scott James Remnant wrote: > > > > > In wait_task_stopped() exit_code already contains the right value for > > > the si_status member of siginfo, and this is simply set in the non > > > WNOWAIT case. > > > > > > Pass it unchanged to wait_noreap_copyout(); we would only need to > > > shift it and add 0x7f if we were returning it in the user status field > > > and that isn't used for any function that permits WNOWAIT. > > > > > Is this bug visible to userspace? If so, I'm surprised that none of the > > various testsuites (which like to exercise this sort of interface) has > > detected it. > > > Absolutely; if you call waitid() with a stopped or traced process, > you'll get the signal in siginfo.si_status as expected -- however if you > call waitid(WNOWAIT) at the same time, you'll get the signal << 8 | 0x7f > hm, OK. Well I guess I'll stick a for-2.6.23 tag on this as well as queueing it for 2.6.24. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/