Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.31 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.31;
Date:   Mon, 23 Oct 2023 16:10:37 +0200
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To:     Krishna Kurapati PSSNV <quic_kriskura@quicinc.com>
Cc:     Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>,
        Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        quic_pkondeti@quicinc.com, quic_ppratap@quicinc.com,
        quic_jackp@quicinc.com, ahalaney@redhat.com,
        quic_shazhuss@quicinc.com, Harsh Agarwal <quic_harshq@quicinc.com>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 03/10] usb: dwc3: core: Refactor PHY logic to support
 Multiport Controller
Message-ID: <ZTZ-3Vick1LBRKYb@hovoldconsulting.com>
References: <20231007154806.605-1-quic_kriskura@quicinc.com>
 <20231007154806.605-4-quic_kriskura@quicinc.com>
 <ZTJPBcyZ_zLXbgE5@hovoldconsulting.com>
 <257716c4-7194-4d26-a34c-fff09234628f@quicinc.com>
 <ZTY42KvYCk9HhCIE@hovoldconsulting.com>
 <e640c995-4751-464b-b6fc-106be822ae1c@quicinc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e640c995-4751-464b-b6fc-106be822ae1c@quicinc.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 06:03:32PM +0530, Krishna Kurapati PSSNV wrote:
> On 10/23/2023 2:41 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> 
> >>>> Multiport currently.
> >>>
> >>> You use capitalised "Multiport" in several places it seems. Is this an
> >>> established term for these controllers or should it just be "multiport"
> >>> or "multiple ports"?
> >>>
> >> This is an established term AFAIK. So I've been using it here like this.
> > 
> > Do you have a pointer? A google search seems to mostly come up with
> > links to this patch series.
> 
> Only pointer I had is the hardware programming guide internally. It 
> mentioned "Multiport" as an established term. I think that is self 
> explanatory in usb context. Isn't it ?

Self-explanatory, yes, just not sure whether capitalising it as
"Multiport" is warranted. But thanks for clarifying where this comes
from.

Johan