Received: by 2002:a05:7412:251c:b0:e2:908c:2ebd with SMTP id w28csp1294131rda; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:17:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEkcEhs12tI4O+Zp1piStYhIQuMOUcFh5gOjFSOskWvx83czaMf41eEnbzYBCXZxCMJA8qG X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:d903:b0:27d:b9d:bd6f with SMTP id c3-20020a17090ad90300b0027d0b9dbd6fmr6928543pjv.45.1698074274774; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:17:54 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1698074274; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BwIZdHWBlpWFgHZCqgAc1206wkyxa+Tr2Pa5/pxOAtOU1D0zkIvF6cHXbTdsRqCPZZ rw2bCt+QwnOyOKRpPugsnomDHek15+iczd5BvROA4C4dr0RJ/HTxU6EFZwrhh+WRwbFE 7ZC0gCPL5xxruIplEkubuEKCtSADNptCMzjMatsZ40iXAaVLep6mlLYWLMecJEEcioJG lbxlwor/Y9xWrWc6P500lZgerbRQHSiaE0IXPJTZDTCYtW75O200QEFs1emh0pijpgAl 6Aj/OBLZg+VwrSeE8lwEa6cSqWqRF+8xF9tkUQSBHMSlCYVgsiBx+lY33FzNbul2orHU g+Aw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:references:message-id:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=JRzc4/rrar4nMcrI+q2ywx0DTsUn3OU1mHARbfzljLg=; fh=mOqrdtzLxfRdhx+JUcCLIFZwj5ZpRA4B+MTwRGfrWMA=; b=WLSXREiXZQLtiZeAbhqL1v7dnIpw3pFdPo3pfk74BJgCsL9tp7OyZU+VNytUQqFFlR lnTl0ZKuuJ/XTeIc/IkjFaZ7hXbNjuPz/Es2soS/WBTn3nr7moSImvFCZwz1VGzeciZ/ lCwy+PiFK51GvMl4Aa1WRxN3XIC0e9VOEvDgEVxLDkrbMKTxVE69mMq+W4I2zpMu6LI0 RSceJGi6rhENiifhGnA2m8QXoKMvuhvNZ1X8MDPg6zeQx0QsWo+AurRqPNgKvsfih1/h sXT74VGuYnF8LvU4LxF2mfWol8fEv/rCRe3GLlT5cHgzs3RMg402CKmdRKcMZkCLKQIq ad2g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=njrTo0wy; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.34 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from howler.vger.email (howler.vger.email. [23.128.96.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ob16-20020a17090b391000b00267ba1c43adsi6725606pjb.101.2023.10.23.08.17.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:17:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.34 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.34; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=njrTo0wy; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.34 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by howler.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC8580746AD; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:17:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.10 at howler.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229740AbjJWPRn (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:17:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48676 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229512AbjJWPRm (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:17:42 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A7FFDD; Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:17:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1698074260; x=1729610260; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=pphEJiS3nqmtlobnO12yCKXXZ3R+xIadP5ryMjqKN94=; b=njrTo0wybrw0Ipm/5mneo7+a5vxyfEGSNnvAhcb0USd/Np4p0id8LHtL p1A/5afDgim2Ymn/fVZwXkmCFrtNmRqva4wSe/bhJwrE3e47QT0BvM+1t cRFrzV4LX8aYAjfnrnYnUcZoo/DdNsZN/EdRAOW60olqvtHo7D8AxZ9Ew 8lcPemMkNQPuAYsI5vAGOqPBtki4TE+FUNbRm0TKuW/UZlDzHEhnlZgwO Qw7MxT2yEU2vgztMjbN4AIA5e6aUtkdATmdQUQK6aHiPB0hmP2l2auO18 lgksLiC2gkaYLpAAxGixL6rNVPJVmla5Hi/sj8ymXCnTFgwDiHRRoG0f6 A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10872"; a="377240399" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,244,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="377240399" Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Oct 2023 08:17:40 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10872"; a="881802367" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,244,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="881802367" Received: from foliveix-mobl5.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.251.211.194]) by orsmga004-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Oct 2023 08:17:38 -0700 Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 18:17:36 +0300 (EEST) From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Ilpo_J=E4rvinen?= To: "David E. Box" cc: LKML , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, rajvi.jingar@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 09/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Allow pmc_core_ssram_init to fail In-Reply-To: <20231018231624.1044633-10-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: <86b2f0a2-535a-5c5e-9f8c-8036a022b3a7@linux.intel.com> References: <20231018231624.1044633-1-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> <20231018231624.1044633-10-david.e.box@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323329-1039076446-1698074259=:1721" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on howler.vger.email Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (howler.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:17:51 -0700 (PDT) This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323329-1039076446-1698074259=:1721 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Wed, 18 Oct 2023, David E. Box wrote: > Currently, if the PMC SSRAM initialization fails, no error is returned and > the only indication is that a PMC device has not been created. Instead, > allow an error to be returned and handled directly by the caller. Don't use > the return value yet. This is in preparation for a future rework of > pmc_core_sram_init(). > > Signed-off-by: David E. Box Reviewed-by: Ilpo J?rvinen -- i. > --- > V4 - Remove return value check in mtl.c. Proper use of the value would > require returning an error status from pmc_core_add_pmc(). But > the function that calls it will be removed in the next patch so wait > to use it then. > > V3 - New patch split from V2 PATCH 9 > - Add dev_warn on pmc_core_ssram_init fail > > drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h | 2 +- > drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core_ssram.c | 21 +++++++++++++-------- > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h > index ccf24e0f5e50..edaa70067e41 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core.h > @@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ int pmc_core_resume_common(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev); > int get_primary_reg_base(struct pmc *pmc); > extern void pmc_core_get_low_power_modes(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev); > > -extern void pmc_core_ssram_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev); > +extern int pmc_core_ssram_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev); > > int spt_core_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev); > int cnp_core_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev); > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core_ssram.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core_ssram.c > index 13fa16f0d52e..815950713e25 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core_ssram.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/core_ssram.c > @@ -35,20 +35,20 @@ static inline u64 get_base(void __iomem *addr, u32 offset) > return lo_hi_readq(addr + offset) & GENMASK_ULL(63, 3); > } > > -static void > +static int > pmc_core_pmc_add(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev, u64 pwrm_base, > const struct pmc_reg_map *reg_map, int pmc_index) > { > struct pmc *pmc = pmcdev->pmcs[pmc_index]; > > if (!pwrm_base) > - return; > + return -ENODEV; > > /* Memory for primary PMC has been allocated in core.c */ > if (!pmc) { > pmc = devm_kzalloc(&pmcdev->pdev->dev, sizeof(*pmc), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!pmc) > - return; > + return -ENOMEM; > } > > pmc->map = reg_map; > @@ -57,10 +57,12 @@ pmc_core_pmc_add(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev, u64 pwrm_base, > > if (!pmc->regbase) { > devm_kfree(&pmcdev->pdev->dev, pmc); > - return; > + return -ENOMEM; > } > > pmcdev->pmcs[pmc_index] = pmc; > + > + return 0; > } > > static void > @@ -96,7 +98,7 @@ pmc_core_ssram_get_pmc(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev, void __iomem *ssram, u32 offset, > iounmap(ssram); > } > > -void pmc_core_ssram_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev) > +int pmc_core_ssram_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev) > { > void __iomem *ssram; > struct pci_dev *pcidev; > @@ -105,7 +107,7 @@ void pmc_core_ssram_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev) > > pcidev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(0, 0, PCI_DEVFN(20, 2)); > if (!pcidev) > - goto out; > + return -ENODEV; > > ret = pcim_enable_device(pcidev); > if (ret) > @@ -123,11 +125,14 @@ void pmc_core_ssram_init(struct pmc_dev *pmcdev) > pmc_core_ssram_get_pmc(pmcdev, ssram, SSRAM_PCH_OFFSET, PMC_IDX_PCH); > > iounmap(ssram); > -out: > - return; > + > + return 0; > > disable_dev: > + pmcdev->ssram_pcidev = NULL; > pci_disable_device(pcidev); > release_dev: > pci_dev_put(pcidev); > + > + return ret; > } > --8323329-1039076446-1698074259=:1721--