Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:2 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:2;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20231023104820.849461819@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20231023104820.849461819@linuxfoundation.org>
From:   Allen Pais <stable.kernel.dev@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:04:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJq+SaDcwDtnLL0AHaBjXqXtPHo2RF9xVp2HptmSot67PV+Zkw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/137] 5.15.137-rc1 review
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org,
        patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de,
        jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de,
        conor@kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.137 release.
> There are 137 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:47:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.137-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

I see the following warnings too:

arch/x86/kernel/head_64.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x5: unreachable instruction
arch/x86/kernel/smp.o: warning: objtool: sysvec_reboot()+0x43:
unreachable instruction

Besides that, I have compiled and boot tested the kernel on both x86 and arm64
test machines and found no regression.

Tested-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>

Thanks.