Received: by 2002:a05:7412:251c:b0:e2:908c:2ebd with SMTP id w28csp1735588rda; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 01:20:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFQWVj9PPGGjXIfSaHF74hD+GFiWBoxiwIQ7b8e7Zsx1q/SpJNQ1nJyvmizHAva8v82bEU6 X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:fd4:b0:27d:262b:93ae with SMTP id gd20-20020a17090b0fd400b0027d262b93aemr7923879pjb.33.1698135659313; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 01:20:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1698135659; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=YDAngElubEwJKo8aZ4LuQz6oj+Rmlsmlhj/x8kKi7Gju9Orly2Z8DOWAtzRPx+eyX/ wMLDsyyYyPBlypjEXhiOkslUfmZBwHNiIbAlNNr9P8wOmKxYnUeGk9qB1XNnezE8ilDF VGEQKSEubDaq7T7NEDJtxdQH0IO/nWH6/Am4JAq//LjDVYYQ7j9wnMRD6ctVlM0BfPhX R5o/RAGHnAlyfIbo9EEJez2QLBmEfkwz5hPWmRQFlBD/3VJaUyYYxY2MGO687M0l8RCs E48xk73u6WQkENlCopPTXw4fnaOICku3mjo6rhfN7kad1W8YqL8nM7lDlQg2/oy52LS5 r0Pg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:dkim-signature:dkim-signature; bh=AvVbgMaT6cDNfVFtjRVpQ+LIKd3Iozxm21HmFOweANk=; fh=W79UR1oZvPHawqfItzkADFGFFYNUywotNKEn/8LcV9E=; b=TuAdlazfVWBaiFPTe/7Btau6/gsHuFD32XggikhV3E6Kh+Go+jUWUEPOFlmh0tfNJ+ hE65mKfNZP+1l5hPiB1h05Gqaqs7nXWItu5J2TrEBbtjWvHy11p3GYi4mkL/qJhyNm68 ow9c1qbMsPsZTHigjTf9uZ9L576r7XIJPIDlGenG/UcaiemS/ipd2lv1QvVJua6K++jN LphcQICHWj9mxC5J7vRJK7H8VfxGnqtJHI/tAT/J6cpEMOvhGNqtpMX6hOjsNdkhsAgv 6/DX55pFlnQPk+QJ7zjePqFOSd9UtXgPjZuQZlAdhxsuzlLrUcTxJp9Qx4XigwUpI2I1 EYuQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=iU912upV; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.32 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from agentk.vger.email (agentk.vger.email. [23.128.96.32]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x23-20020a17090a789700b00276c4e7b5e2si10309621pjk.146.2023.10.24.01.20.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 24 Oct 2023 01:20:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.32 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.32; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=iU912upV; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.32 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by agentk.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526A98095665; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 01:20:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.10 at agentk.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232893AbjJXIUP (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 24 Oct 2023 04:20:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54260 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232004AbjJXIUO (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Oct 2023 04:20:14 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43D5A8F for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 01:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D802B1FE61; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 08:20:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1698135610; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AvVbgMaT6cDNfVFtjRVpQ+LIKd3Iozxm21HmFOweANk=; b=iU912upV5klSqCuzCr3tutf69PU2ssvPEfGowY/jLenKYbDq6acrvFRoRviGK/AcIUyjfB 5LW0FbG9xyQ7q72H9CucIFrwPbVngIHDO890DEkg6y0HjMqoQbBS9WZfIR4V1FahMpNlg/ 42S+Rqi/mqB6a22gXcn4xFqcZH7QZb8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1698135610; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AvVbgMaT6cDNfVFtjRVpQ+LIKd3Iozxm21HmFOweANk=; b=321utMuP9cfe+M0NDWYUkHluxsSmLJZ8SrDN4KlhmBx3Lu3HbvIuWoxZMHgtoiBXugo0lp MRTJfbZpptb/7NAQ== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F84D134F5; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 08:20:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id 6v9qIjp+N2U8XwAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 24 Oct 2023 08:20:10 +0000 Message-ID: <4b687334-9667-2655-ab5b-a1aecedb5591@suse.cz> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:20:10 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] slub: Delay freezing of CPU partial slabs Content-Language: en-US To: Chengming Zhou , cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org Cc: rientjes@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, 42.hyeyoo@gmail.com, willy@infradead.org, pcc@google.com, tytso@mit.edu, maz@kernel.org, ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com, vishal.moola@gmail.com, lrh2000@pku.edu.cn, hughd@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Chengming Zhou References: <20231021144317.3400916-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev> <4134b039-fa99-70cd-3486-3d0c7632e4a3@suse.cz> <72361910-240f-4aa2-a695-117e1b14a804@linux.dev> From: Vlastimil Babka In-Reply-To: <72361910-240f-4aa2-a695-117e1b14a804@linux.dev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Score: -7.57 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.57 / 50.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[google.com,lge.com,linux-foundation.org,linux.dev,gmail.com,infradead.org,mit.edu,kernel.org,fujitsu.com,pku.edu.cn,vger.kernel.org,kvack.org,bytedance.com]; BAYES_HAM(-0.97)[86.84%]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-3.00)[-1.000]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_TWELVE(0.00)[19]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[] X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on agentk.vger.email Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (agentk.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Tue, 24 Oct 2023 01:20:25 -0700 (PDT) On 10/24/23 04:20, Chengming Zhou wrote: > On 2023/10/23 23:46, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> Or more precisely, instead of returning the acquired "object" we would >> return the first slab removed from partial list. I think it would simplify >> the code a bit, and further reduce list_lock holding times. > > Ok, I will do this in the next version. But I find we have to return the object > in the "IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SLUB_TINY) || kmem_cache_debug(s)" case, in which > we need to allocate a single object under the node list_lock. Ah, right. > Maybe we can use "struct partial_context" to return the object in this case? > > struct partial_context { > - struct slab **slab; > gfp_t flags; > unsigned int orig_size; > + void *object; > }; > > Then we can change all get_partial interfaces to return a slab. Do you agree > with this way? Yeah, good idea! Thanks!