Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.33 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.33;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20231010124357.5251e100@canb.auug.org.au> <20231019120618.71424848@canb.auug.org.au>
 <20231024115903.2d73440c@canb.auug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <20231024115903.2d73440c@canb.auug.org.au>
From:   Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Oct 2023 08:57:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CADnq5_Od1cQFp=5__LexMKzXwtnmcmcAidE-XsLkL3N4oz+5sg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the amdgpu tree
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
        Qingqing Zhuo <Qingqing.Zhuo@amd.com>,
        Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>,
        Roman Li <roman.li@amd.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 8:59=E2=80=AFPM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org=
.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 12:06:18 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au=
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 12:43:57 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.=
au> wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the amdgpu tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > >
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml2/display_mode_core.c: In=
 function 'dml_core_mode_support':
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dml2/display_mode_core.c:822=
9:1: error: the frame size of 2736 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Werror=
=3Dframe-larger-than=3D]
> > >  8229 | } // dml_core_mode_support
> > >       | ^
> > > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> > >
> > > Caused by commit
> > >
> > >   7966f319c66d ("drm/amd/display: Introduce DML2")
> > >
> > > (or maybe something later that changed storage size).
> > >
> > > I have used the amdgpu tree from next-20231009 for today.
> >
> > This build failure now (presumably) exists in the drm tree.  I am still
> > applying the 2 patches from Rodrigo to my tree as a work around.
> >
> > I would have expected that this was fixed in the amdgpu tree before
> > Dave was asked to merge it ...
>
> Any progress here?  I am still applying the 2 patches.

The two patches are in my -next tree and in the PR I sent last week.

Alex