Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:4 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:4;
Date:   Tue, 24 Oct 2023 17:59:13 +0200 (GMT+02:00)
From:   =?UTF-8?Q?Thomas_Wei=C3=9Fschuh_?= <thomas@t-8ch.de>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Thomas_Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= <linux@weissschuh.net>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <d5d7dcdf-11d7-4bfb-9aeb-c440394ddfc4@t-8ch.de>
In-Reply-To: <20231023-nolibc-waitpid-flags-v2-1-b09d096f091f@kernel.org>
References: <20231023-nolibc-waitpid-flags-v2-1-b09d096f091f@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tools/nolibc: Use linux/wait.h rather than
 duplicating it
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

Thanks!

Oct 23, 2023 20:42:52 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>:

> Linux defines a few custom flags for waitpid() which aren't currently
> provided by nolibc, make them available to nolibc based programs by just
> including linux/wait.h where they are defined instead of defining our
> own copy of the flags.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Thomas Wei=C3=9Fschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>

I can apply it, but only next week.

Thomas