Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:7 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:7;
Message-ID: <0fa6630b-ca9f-4441-b698-f983ed8b9748@quicinc.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 Oct 2023 09:19:52 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v7] Misc SCM changes
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
CC:     Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@quicinc.com>, <agross@kernel.org>,
        <andersson@kernel.org>, <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>, <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <1696440338-12561-1-git-send-email-quic_mojha@quicinc.com>
 <f3a4c114-b430-47ce-a746-4a840994dc58@quicinc.com>
 <CAA8EJpr0Nnn5Tr=2CBAADYfNU6cnKuq==x5L5YQoko9C=3q2tg@mail.gmail.com>
 <d6f48748-22c4-4e4c-a1e9-7a6940b9b432@quicinc.com>
 <CAA8EJpqd-1=sFd3Hm-XbAq8WJfY+hL2Hd5mc23RnCimMbQM69w@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA8EJpqd-1=sFd3Hm-XbAq8WJfY+hL2Hd5mc23RnCimMbQM69w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 10/25/2023 1:34 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 at 19:00, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy
> <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/24/2023 8:38 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 at 16:31, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy
>> <quic_kathirav@quicinc.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/4/2023 10:55 PM, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>>
>> I have given version to this series as v7 as it has already
>> gone through v6 and later got added to minidump patch series
>> However, these 3 patches can go independently and has no
>> relation with minidump hence, separated it from minidump series.
>>
>> Mukesh, Can you rebase this series on top of linux-next, since there is
>> a conflict?
>>
>>
>> Bjorn, after rebase is done, will you able to pick it up for v6.7 if
>> there is a time? These patches(#1  and #3) are required for the crash
>> dump collection on IPQ9574 and IPQ5332 SoCs.
>>
>> It is not obvious that they are fixes for the crash. You did not add
>> Fixes tags, you didn't follow
>> Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst. Cover letter is
>> useless. How can we guess that they are urgent / important?
>>
>>
>> Dmitry,
> 
> Could you please turn off HTML message composition. For example your
> message completely messed up the quoting in the text above.


My bad. After the mail client update, HTML message composition is enabled.

> 
>> These patches are not the *fixes* for the existing crashes, these are required to *enable* the crash dump / ram dump collection by boot loader when qcom_scm.download_mode is set to 1 on IPQ9574 and IPQ5332 SoCs.
> 
> Please excuse me, I misread your message, mea culpa. Indeed, they are
> not a fix for the existing error...


Yeah, no problem at all.


> 
>>
>> Reason why I *requested* to pick it up for 6.7 if possible is, initial version is submitted in Jan 2023 by Poovendhan[1] and then later Mukesh integrated the initial series into his minidump series. Then I separated out these patches[2] from mindump series since there is no dependency for these patches to be part of minidump series but unfortunately again integrated back into the minidump series. Finally Mukesh again separated out these patches now.
>>
>> Since there are no active comments to be addressed, I was hoping this series to be picked for 6.7. As long as these patches doesn't go out of the radar, I'm fine :)
>>
> 
> 
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry