Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:18:10 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>, Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, rientjes@google.com,
       nacc@us.ibm.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask
In-Reply-To: <20071120141953.GB32313@csn.ul.ie>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711201217430.26419@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
References: <20071109143226.23540.12907.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie>
 <20071109143426.23540.44459.sendpatchset@skynet.skynet.ie>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711090741120.13932@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
 <20071120141953.GB32313@csn.ul.ie>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 682
Lines: 14

On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Mel Gorman wrote:

> Went back and revisited this. Allocating them at boot-time is below but
> essentially it is a silly and it makes sense to just have two zonelists
> where one of them is for __GFP_THISNODE. Implementation wise, this involves
> dropping the last patch in the set and the overall result is still a reduction
> in the number of zonelists.

Allright with me. Andrew could we get this patchset merged?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/